News

The court unanimously ruled that members of majority groups do not face a higher legal standard than minorities to prevail in so-called reverse discrimination lawsuits under Title VII, the federal ...
The U.S. Supreme Court recently realigned the burden of proof for all employees under Title VII in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services. Previously, several appellate courts required majority ...
If the Supreme Court rules as expected, reverse discrimination will soon be just as illegal as regular discrimination is in this country. And that will be a great day for equality in America.
A recent Supreme Court ruling in a case of so-called reverse discrimination is significant for employers and employees alike.
DEI under fire: Why more businesses are being accused of ‘reverse discrimination’ David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging at the NYU ...
The New Haven fire department was at the center of a discrimination lawsuit that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the Supreme Court is poised to clarify the legal standard for evaluating reverse discrimination claims. Put simply, the court will decide how ...
WASHINGTON (AP) — A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, siding with an Ohio woman who claims she didn’t get a job and then ...
A Supreme Court ruling about discrimination claims was a win for the rule of law, not a judicial ideology, Bloomberg Opinion columnist Noah Feldman writes.
The U.S. Supreme Court on June 5 made it easier for workers to file so-called "reverse discrimination" lawsuits after siding with Ohio worker Marlean Ames who claimed she didn't get a job and was ...