The U.S. Supreme Court recently realigned the burden of proof for all employees under Title VII in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services. Previously, several appellate courts required majority ...

A constitutional amendment enshrining broad anti-discrimination protections and repealing Ohio’s dormant same-sex marriage ...

The U.S. Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, held that “reverse discrimination” cases should be reviewed under the same standard as minority-group ...

A Supreme Court ruling about discrimination claims was a win for the rule of law, not a judicial ideology, Bloomberg Opinion columnist Noah Feldman writes.

Supreme Court’s Ruling Against Reverse Discrimination Strikes a Blow for Fairness in Hiring, Promotions High court levels the legal playing field, saying that everyone deserves the same protection ...

NEWSLETTERS The ‘reverse discrimination’ US Supreme Court ruling could’ve been much worse There are bigger battles ahead to fight.

Noah Feldman: ‘Reverse discrimination’ ruling is a win for the rule of law Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — arguably the Supreme Court’s most progressive member — emphasized that the text ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held Thursday ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5. The ...