President Donald Trump's decision to attack Iran has renewed a long-running debate about war powers. The Constitution gives ...

In this fragile moment, it is essential for Congress to reassert its authority and reign in the rogue actions of this ...

The war powers vote faces steep odds, with Republicans controlling both the House and Senate and GOP leadership backing Trump ...

In the wake of the US attacks on Iran over the weekend, there was immediate bipartisan chatter in Congress about passing a resolution accusing President Trump of violating the War Powers Act. The 1973 ...

Some congressional lawmakers are still pushing for a war powers resolution that would limit President Trump's involvement in ...

If the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional, it's because it gives the president too much power, not too little.

In an apparent nod to Israel, some Democrats want to give Trump power to defend “an ally or partner of the United States from ...

A: No. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs changed the wording in its bylaws to comply with recent executive orders. In making the changes, words including “national origin, politics, marital ...

There’s a growing divide among U.S. lawmakers, including among Northwest Ohio representatives, over the use of military ...

Against the backdrop of U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, a scholar of presidential powers examines the history and ...

Presidents must issue reports on every military action within two days — something Trump didn’t do with the Iran strike.

President Trump’s bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites has come under legal scrutiny, as some suggest his decision to ...